Reconstructing Criminal Liability in India: Mens Rea, Judicial Interpretation and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

Авторы

  • Khushboo Panjab University image/svg+xml Автор
    • Разработка концепции
    • Разработка методологии
    • Написание черновика рукописи
    • Написание рукописи – рецензирование и редактирование
    Конфликт интересов

    No Competing Interests

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22911622

Ключевые слова:

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Criminal Evidence, Judicial Interpretation, Criminal Liability, Mens Rea, Criminal Culpability

Аннотация

The enactment of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 marks a significant reorganisation of India’s substantive criminal law and raises renewed questions concerning the foundations of criminal responsibility. This article examines the changing architecture of criminal liability under the new statutory framework, with particular emphasis on mens rea, intention, knowledge, evidentiary inference and judicial interpretation. It argues that criminal liability cannot be established solely through the identification of prohibited conduct or harmful consequences. The attribution of criminal responsibility requires a principled connection between the accused’s conduct, the mental element prescribed by the offence, and evidence sufficient to establish that element. The article further examines how the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 structures the evidentiary process through which intention, motive, preparation and subsequent conduct may become relevant to criminal adjudication. Particular attention is given to the judicial task of distinguishing legitimate inference from suspicion when determining guilt on circumstantial evidence. Drawing upon Indian criminal jurisprudence and contemporary scholarship on legal meaning, the article contends that the BNS should not be understood merely as a replacement of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, but as a new statutory setting in which established principles of culpability require careful judicial application. It concludes that legality, mens rea, evidentiary discipline and reasoned interpretation remain essential safeguards against unjustified expansion of criminal responsibility.

524 20

Скачивания

Данные по скачиваниям пока не доступны.

Биография автора

  • Khushboo, Panjab University

     Advocate at High Court of Punjab & Haryana, Chandigarh, India; Department of Laws, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

Библиографические ссылки

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 2023. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Act No. 45 of 2023. New Delhi: Government of India.

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam. 2023. The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. Act No. 47 of 2023. New Delhi: Government of India.

Nathulal v State of Madhya Pradesh. 1966. AIR 1966 SC 43. Supreme Court of India.

Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v State of Maharashtra. 1984. AIR 1984 SC 1622; (1984) 4 SCC 116. Supreme Court of India.

Singh, Abhinav. 2025. “Speaking Law: Karakia and the Juridical Semiotics of Authority in Aotearoa New Zealand.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 39 (6): 1867–1886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10400-x.

Singh, Abhinav. 2026. “Burial as Law: Tikanga Māori and the Semiotic Limits of Legal Recognition in Aotearoa New Zealand.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 39 (2): 761–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10358-w.

State of Maharashtra v Mayer Hans George. 1965. AIR 1965 SC 722; (1965) 1 SCR 123. Supreme Court of India.

State of Rajasthan v Shera Ram. 2012. (2012) 1 SCC 602; AIR 2012 SC 1. Supreme Court of India.

Опубликован

2026-03-10

Выпуск

Раздел

Articles

Как цитировать

Khushboo. (2026). Reconstructing Criminal Liability in India: Mens Rea, Judicial Interpretation and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Oxford Law Review, 1(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22911622

Похожие статьи

1-10 из 29

Вы также можете начать расширеннвй поиск похожих статей для этой статьи.